The use of different indirect tests to evaluate dynamic muscle strength and the proportion of muscle fibers: a narrative review

  • Guilherme Pereira Saborosa Programa de Pós-graduação em Nutrição e Saúde, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brasil; Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Respostas Neuromusculares (GEPREN), Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brasil.
  • Wesley Marçal Santos Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Respostas Neuromusculares (GEPREN), Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brasil; Laboratório de Avaliação da Carga (LAC), Escola de Educação Física, Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional - EEFFTO, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
  • Osvaldo Costa Moreira Programa de Pós-graduação em Nutrição e Saúde, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brasil; Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Respostas Neuromusculares (GEPREN), Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brasil; Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Campus Florestal, Brasil.
  • Sandro Fernandes da Silva Programa de Pós-graduação em Nutrição e Saúde, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brasil; Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Respostas Neuromusculares (GEPREN), Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brasil.
Keywords: Physical Training, Muscle Fibers, Muscle strength

Abstract

Introduction: Obtaining information on muscle strength and the proportion of muscle fibers are crucial for the process of planning and prescribing physical training. Different types of tests are used to measure muscle strength and the individual predominance of muscle fibers, whether considered gold standard or those that estimate variables indirectly, with acceptable validity and reliability in the literature. Objective: To explore and present the methods and/or indirect tests proposed in the literature to estimate dynamic muscle strength and the predominance of muscle fibers. Materials and Methods: The following databases were used: US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health (PubMed) and Google Scholar. No specific search methods were used, only studies dealing with the research topic. Discussion: Different types of tests and/or indirect methods are proposed in the literature that present positive results when compared to direct tests. Determining that the use of these tests and/or methods may be useful in the practice of coaches, athletes and researchers. Conclusion: It is considered that the test of one repetition maximum (1RM) can be the best alternative to estimate the dynamic muscular strength. While for muscle fiber predominance, muscle resistance test has been presented as a potential method for estimating the proportion of muscle fibers. However, more studies are needed to obtain concrete information about the predominance of muscle fibers through this test.

References

-Ahmetov, I.I.; Vinogradova, O.L.; Williams, A.G. Gene Polymorphisms and Fiber-Type Composition of Human Skeletal Muscle. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. Vol. 22. Num. 4. 2012 p. 292-303.

-Benton, M.J.; Raab, S.; Waggener, G.T. Effect of Training Status on Reliability of One Repetition Maximum Testing in Women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 27. Num. 7. 2013. p. 1885-1890.

-Baguet, A.; e colaboradores. A New Method for Non-Invasive Estimation of Human Muscle Fiber Type Composition. PLoS ONE. Vol. 6. Num. 7. 2011. p. e21956.

-BottinellI, R.; Reggiani, C. Human Skeletal Muscle Fibres: Molecular and Functional Diversity. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. Vol. 73. Num. 2-4. 2000. p. 195-262.

-Dahmane, R.; e colaboradores. Evaluation of the Ability to Make Non-invasive Estimation of Muscle Contractile Properties on the Basis of the Muscle Belly Response. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. Vol. 39. Num. 1. 2001. p. 51-55.

-Dahmane, R.; e colaboradores. Spatial Fiber Type Distribution in Normal Human Muscle: Histochemical and Tensiomyographical Evaluation. Journal of Biomechanics. Vol. 38. Num. 12. 2005. p. 2451–2459.

-Dahmane, R.; Djordjevič, S.; Smerdu, V. Adaptive Potential of Human Biceps Femoris Muscle Demonstrated by Histochemical, Immunohistochemical and Mechanomyographical methods. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. Vol. 44. Num. 11. 2006. p. 999-1006.

-De Ste Croix, M.B.A.; Deighan, M.A.; Armstrong, N. Assessment and Interpretation of Isokinetic Muscle Strength During Growth and Maturation. Sports Medicine. Vol. 33. Num. 10. 2003. p. 727-743.

-Dias, R.M.R.; e colaboradores. Segurança, Reprodutibilidade, Fatores Intervenientes e Aplicabilidade de Testes de 1-RM. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física. Vol. 19. Num. 1. 2013. p. 231-242.

-Ellis, R.; e colaboradores. Reliability of One-repetition Maximum Performance in People with Chronic Heart Failure. Disability and Rehabilitation. Vol. 41. Num. 14. 2019. p. 1706-1710.

-Faigenbaum, A.D.; e colaboradores. Reliability of the One-Repetition-Maximum Power Clean Test in Adolescent Athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 26. Num. 2. 2012. p. 432-437.

-Fry, A.C.; e colaboradores. Noninvasive Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Myosin Heavy Chain Expression in Trained and Untrained Men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 31. Num. 9. 2017. p. 2355-2362.

-Grgic, J.; e colaboradores. Test–Retest Reliability of the One-Repetition Maximum (1RM) Strength Assessment: a Systematic Review. Sports Medicine - Open. Vol. 6. Num. 1. 2020. p. 31.

-Hall, E.C.R.; e colaboradores. Prediction of Muscle Fiber Composition Using Multiple Repetition Testing. Biology of Sport. Vol. 38. Num. 2. 2021. p. 277-283.

-Hill, C.; e colaboradores. Myosin-based Regulation of Twitch and Tetanic Contractions in Mammalian Skeletal Muscle. eLife. Vol. 10. 2021. p. 1-26.

-Hughes, D.C.; Ellefsen, S.; Baar, K. Adaptations to Endurance and Strength Training. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. Vol. 8. Num. 6. 2018. p. a029769.

-Karp, J.R. Muscle Fiber Types and Training. Strength and Conditioning Journal. Vol. 23. Num. 5. 2001. p. 21.

-Kozinc, Ž.; Smajla, D.; Šarabon, N. The Rate of Force Development Scaling Factor: A Review of Underlying Factors, Assessment Methods and Potential for Practical Applications. European Journal of Applied Physiology. Vol. 122. Num. 4. 2022. p. 861-873.

-Lesnak, J.B.; e colaboradores. Ability of Isokinetic Dynamometer to Predict Isotonic Knee Extension 1-Repetition Maximum. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. Vol. 29. Num. 5. 2020. p. 616-620.

-Merletti, R.; Lo Conte, L.R. Electrically Evoked Surface Myoelectric Signals. Functional Neurology. Vol. 7. Num. 4 Suppl. 1992. p. 153-158.

-Paul, D.J.; Nassis, G.P. Testing Strength and Power in Soccer Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 29. Num. 6. 2015. p. 1748-1758.

-Pozzo, M.; e colaboradores. Muscle-fiber Conduction Velocity Estimated from Surface EMG Signals During Explosive Dynamic Contractions. Muscle and Nerve. Vol. 29. Num. 6. 2004. p. 823-833.

-Rodríguez Ruiz, D.; e colaboradores. Tensiomiografia Utilizada para a Avaliação de Jogadores de Vôlei de Praia de Alto Nível. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. Vol. 18. Num. 2. 2012. p. 95-99.

-Schiaffino, S.; Reggiani, C. Fiber Types in Mammalian Skeletal Muscles. Physiological Reviews. Vol. 91. Num. 4. 2011. p. 1447-1531.

-Semenova, E.A.; e colaboradores. The Variability of DNA Structure and Muscle-Fiber Composition. Human Physiology. Vol. 45. Num. 2. 2019. p. 225-232.

-Staron, R.S.; e colaboradores. Fiber Type Composition of the Vastus Lateralis Muscle of Young Men and Women. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. Vol. 48. Num. 5. 2000. p. 623-629.

-Terzis, G.; e colaboradores. Fiber Type Composition and Capillary Density in Relation to Submaximal Number of Repetitions in Resistance Exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 22. Num. 3. 2008. p. 845-850.

-Van Beijsterveldt, A.M.C.; e colaboradores. Risk Factors for Hamstring Injuries in Male Soccer Players: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. Vol. 23. Num. 3. 2013. p. 253-262.

-Verdijk, L.B.; e colaboradores. One-repetition Maximum Strength Test Represents a Valid Means to Assess Leg Strength in Vivo in Humans. Journal of Sports Sciences. Vol. 27. Num. 1. 2009. p. 59-68.

-Walmsley, R.P.; Szybbo, C. A Comparative Study of the Torque Generated by the Shoulder Internal and External Rotator Muscles in Different Positions and at Varying Speeds. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. Vol. 9. Num. 6. 1987. p. 217-222.

-Skurvydas, A.; e colaboradores. What are the Best Isometric Exercises of Muscle Potentiation?. European Journal of Applied Physiology. Vol. 119. Num. 4. 2019. p. 1029-1039.

-Suchomel, T.J.; Nimphius, S.; Stone, M.H. The Importance of Muscular Strength in Athletic Performance. Sports medicine. Vol. 46. Num. 10. 2016. p. 1419-1449.

Published
2023-01-15
How to Cite
Saborosa, G. P., Santos , W. M., Moreira , O. C., & Silva, S. F. da. (2023). The use of different indirect tests to evaluate dynamic muscle strength and the proportion of muscle fibers: a narrative review. Brazilian Journal of Exercise Prescription and Physiology, 16(106), 655-662. Retrieved from https://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/2640
Section
Scientific Articles - Review